Celeron D 352 vs GX-210JA

Celeron D 352 vs GX-210JA Performance Spectrum

Celeron D 352

1 / 1

418

0.0%

425

+1.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron D 352 vs GX-210JA FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron D 352 vs GX-210JA: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron D 352

2006

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike GX-210JA.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than GX-210JA across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (418 vs 425).
❌Launch MSRP is still $69 MSRP, while GX-210JA mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌8300% higher power demand at 84W vs 1W.

GX-210JA

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 84W, a 83W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.

Quick Answers

So, is GX-210JA better than Celeron D 352?

Yes. GX-210JA is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, GX-210JA is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, GX-210JA is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

GX-210JA is still the much better call for a fresh build. GX-210JA comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron D 352 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (6.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GX-210JA makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron D 352 vs GX-210JA Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

GX-210JA

The GX-210JA is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron D 352 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the GX-210JA offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the GX-210JA has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 versus 1 GHz on the GX-210JA — a 104.8% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Celeron D 352 uses the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the GX-210JA uses Temash (2013) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron D 352 scores 418 against the GX-210JA's 425 — a 1.7% lead for the GX-210JA.

Feature	Celeron D 352	GX-210JA
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+220%	1 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	28 nm-57%
Architecture	Cedar Mill (2006)	Temash (2013)
PassMark	418	425+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron D 352 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the GX-210JA uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron D 352	GX-210JA
Socket	LGA775	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Celeron D 352) / not specified (GX-210JA). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.