Celeron D 352 vs Sempron LE-1250

Celeron D 352 vs Sempron LE-1250 Performance Spectrum

Celeron D 352

1 / 1

418

0.0%

420

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron D 352 vs Sempron LE-1250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron D 352 vs Sempron LE-1250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron D 352

2006

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Sempron LE-1250.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (418 vs 420).
❌Launch MSRP is still $69 MSRP, while Sempron LE-1250 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌86.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 45W.

Sempron LE-1250

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 84W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron LE-1250 better than Celeron D 352?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron D 352 is ahead with 45.5% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Sempron LE-1250 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron LE-1250 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron LE-1250 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron LE-1250 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Celeron D 352 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (6.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron LE-1250 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron D 352 vs Sempron LE-1250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron LE-1250

The Sempron LE-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $29.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron D 352 and Sempron LE-1250 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 versus 2.2 GHz on the Sempron LE-1250 — a 37% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Celeron D 352 uses the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron LE-1250 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron D 352 scores 418 against the Sempron LE-1250's 420 — a 0.5% lead for the Sempron LE-1250. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron D 352	Sempron LE-1250
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+45%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Cedar Mill (2006)	Sparta (2007)
PassMark	418	420
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron D 352 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1250 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron D 352	Sempron LE-1250
Socket	LGA775	AM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Celeron D 352) / not specified (Sempron LE-1250). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.