Athlon XP 3100+ vs Celeron D 352

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Celeron D 352 Performance Spectrum

Athlon XP 3100+

1 / 1

425

+1.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron D 352

1 / 1

418

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Celeron D 352 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Celeron D 352: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 3100+

2003

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 68W instead of 84W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.

Celeron D 352

2006

Why buy it

✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 113.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 2.8 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Athlon XP 3100+.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon XP 3100+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (418 vs 425).
❌23.5% higher power demand at 84W vs 68W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon XP 3100+ better than Celeron D 352?

Yes. Athlon XP 3100+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon XP 3100+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 3100+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon XP 3100+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon XP 3100+ comes in 117.4% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron D 352 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 113.8% better value on paper (6.1 vs 2.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron D 352 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Celeron D 352 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon XP 3100+

The Athlon XP 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 3100+ and Celeron D 352 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon XP 3100+ versus 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 — a 37% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Athlon XP 3100+ uses the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron D 352 uses Cedar Mill (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3100+ scores 425 against the Celeron D 352's 418 — a 1.7% lead for the Athlon XP 3100+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon XP 3100+	Celeron D 352
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3.2 GHz+45%
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	512 kB+100%
Process	130 nm	65 nm-50%
Architecture	Thorton (2001−2003)	Cedar Mill (2006)
PassMark	425+2%	418
Geekbench 6 Single	—	180

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 3100+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron D 352 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 3100+ versus 800 on the Celeron D 352 — the Celeron D 352 supports -340.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon XP 3100+) vs 2 (Celeron D 352). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 3100+) and 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352).

Feature	Athlon XP 3100+	Celeron D 352
Socket	A	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR-333	800
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon XP 3100+) / false (Celeron D 352). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

Feature	Athlon XP 3100+	Celeron D 352
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	false
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon XP 3100+ was priced at $150, while the Celeron D 352 came in at $69. On launch pricing ($150 vs $69), Celeron D 352 was $81 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 3100+ delivers 2.8 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the Celeron D 352 — making the Celeron D 352 the 72.5% better value option.

Feature	Athlon XP 3100+	Celeron D 352
MSRP	$150	$69-54%
Performance per Dollar	2.8	6.1+118%
Release Date	2003	2006

Search Athlon XP 3100+ on Amazon

Search Celeron D 352 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.