Athlon XP 3100+ vs Sempron 3400+

AMD

Athlon XP 3100+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron 3400+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 2 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Sempron 3400+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Sempron 3400+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Sempron 3400+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 3100+

2003

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (425 vs 433).
    • Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Sempron 3400+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Sempron 3400+

    2005

    Why buy it

    • +1.9% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 62W instead of 68W, a 6W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Sempron 3400+ better than Athlon XP 3100+?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon XP 3100+ is ahead with 10% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3400+ pulls ahead with 1.9% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3400+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Sempron 3400+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron 3400+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% better PassMark. Athlon XP 3100+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2003 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (2.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on A.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron 3400+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon XP 3100+ vs Sempron 3400+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon XP 3100+

    The Athlon XP 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $149.

    AMD

    Sempron 3400+

    The Sempron 3400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 433 points. Launch price was $30.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon XP 3100+ and Sempron 3400+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon XP 3100+ versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3400+ — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3100+. The Athlon XP 3100+ uses the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 3400+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3100+ scores 425 against the Sempron 3400+'s 433 — a 1.9% lead for the Sempron 3400+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAthlon XP 3100+Sempron 3400+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.2 GHz+10%
    2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    256 kB+100%
    128 kB
    Process
    130 nm
    90 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Thorton (2001−2003)
    Palermo (2001−2005)
    PassMark
    425
    433+2%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon XP 3100+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3400+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon XP 3100+Sempron 3400+
    Socket
    A
    939
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR-333
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0