Athlon XP 3100+ vs Turion 64 MT-28

AMD

Athlon XP 3100+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2003
VS
AMD

Turion 64 MT-28

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Turion 64 MT-28 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Turion 64 MT-28 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Turion 64 MT-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 3100+

2003

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 68W instead of 512W, a 444W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (425 vs 445).
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Turion 64 MT-28 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 MT-28

2005

Why buy it

  • βœ…+4.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • ❌652.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 68W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon XP 3100+ better than Turion 64 MT-28?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon XP 3100+ is ahead with 37.5% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 MT-28 pulls ahead with 4.7% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 MT-28 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon XP 3100+ is the better buy right now. Athlon XP 3100+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 37.5% higher max boost clock. The compromise is that Turion 64 MT-28 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 4.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Turion 64 MT-28 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Turion 64 MT-28 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon XP 3100+

The Athlon XP 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thorton (2001βˆ’2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Turion 64 MT-28

The Turion 64 MT-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005βˆ’2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $69.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 3100+ and Turion 64 MT-28 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon XP 3100+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-28 β€” a 31.6% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3100+. The Athlon XP 3100+ uses the Thorton (2001βˆ’2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-28 uses Lancaster (2005βˆ’2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3100+ scores 425 against the Turion 64 MT-28's 445 β€” a 4.6% lead for the Turion 64 MT-28. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon XP 3100+Turion 64 MT-28
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+38%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
512 kB+100%
Process
130 nm
90 nm-31%
Architecture
Thorton (2001βˆ’2003)
Lancaster (2005βˆ’2006)
PassMark
425
445+5%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 3100+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 MT-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon XP 3100+Turion 64 MT-28
Socket
A
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-333
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
β€”
RAM Channels
1
β€”
ECC Support
No
β€”
PCIe Lanes
0
β€”