Athlon XP 3100+ vs Sempron LE-1300

AMD

Athlon XP 3100+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron LE-1300

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Sempron LE-1300 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Sempron LE-1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Sempron LE-1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 3100+

2003

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (425 vs 438).
    • Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Sempron LE-1300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 51.1% higher power demand at 68W vs 45W.

    Sempron LE-1300

    2007

    Why buy it

    • Draws 45W instead of 68W, a 23W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Sempron LE-1300 better than Athlon XP 3100+?
    Yes. Sempron LE-1300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 3.1% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Sempron LE-1300 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 4.5% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron LE-1300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Sempron LE-1300 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron LE-1300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.1% higher PassMark. Athlon XP 3100+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2003 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (2.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on A.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron LE-1300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon XP 3100+ vs Sempron LE-1300 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon XP 3100+

    The Athlon XP 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $149.

    AMD

    Sempron LE-1300

    The Sempron LE-1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 438 points. Launch price was $12.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon XP 3100+ and Sempron LE-1300 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon XP 3100+ versus 2.3 GHz on the Sempron LE-1300 — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1300. The Athlon XP 3100+ uses the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron LE-1300 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3100+ scores 425 against the Sempron LE-1300's 438 — a 3% lead for the Sempron LE-1300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAthlon XP 3100+Sempron LE-1300
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.2 GHz
    2.3 GHz+5%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    256 kB
    512 kB+100%
    Process
    130 nm
    65 nm-50%
    Architecture
    Thorton (2001−2003)
    Sparta (2007)
    PassMark
    425
    438+3%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon XP 3100+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1300 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon XP 3100+Sempron LE-1300
    Socket
    A
    AM2
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR-333
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0