Celeron D 352 vs VIA Nano U2250
Celeron D 352
VIA Nano U2250
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron D 352 is positioned at rank 1062 and the VIA Nano U2250 is on rank 1119, so the Celeron D 352 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron D 352
Performance Per Dollar VIA Nano U2250
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron D 352 | VIA Nano U2250 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Cedar Mill (2006) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Isaiah (2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron D 352 | VIA Nano U2250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+53%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron D 352 and VIA Nano U2250
Celeron D 352
The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.
VIA Nano U2250
The VIA Nano U2250 is manufactured by VIA. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Isaiah (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron D 352 and VIA Nano U2250 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 versus 1.5 GHz on the VIA Nano U2250 — a 72.3% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Celeron D 352 uses the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the VIA Nano U2250 uses Isaiah (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron D 352 scores 418 against the VIA Nano U2250's 425 — a 1.7% lead for the VIA Nano U2250. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 150, a 18.2% lead for the Celeron D 352 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | VIA Nano U2250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+113% | 1.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Cedar Mill (2006) | Isaiah (2009) |
| PassMark | 418 | 425+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180+20% | 150 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 150 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron D 352 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the VIA Nano U2250 uses NanoBGA2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron D 352 versus DDR3-1333 on the VIA Nano U2250 — the Celeron D 352 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron D 352) vs 1 (VIA Nano U2250). PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron D 352) vs 1 (VIA Nano U2250) — the VIA Nano U2250 offers 1 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352) and VX900 (VIA Nano U2250).
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | VIA Nano U2250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | NanoBGA2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 800+26567% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 | 4 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 1 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Celeron D 352) vs VT-x (VIA Nano U2250). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget, VIA Nano U2250 targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | VIA Nano U2250 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Embedded |
Value Analysis
The Celeron D 352 launched at $69 MSRP, while the VIA Nano U2250 debuted at $50. At current prices ($15 vs $10), the VIA Nano U2250 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron D 352 delivers 27.9 pts/$ vs 42.5 pts/$ for the VIA Nano U2250 — making the VIA Nano U2250 the 41.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | VIA Nano U2250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69 | $50-28% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.9 | 42.5+52% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron D 352 and VIA Nano U2250
