Celeron D 352 vs Sempron 3300+

Celeron D 352 vs Sempron 3300+ Performance Spectrum

Celeron D 352

1 / 1

418

+1.5%

412

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron D 352 vs Sempron 3300+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron D 352 vs Sempron 3300+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron D 352

2006

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Sempron 3300+.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $69 MSRP, while Sempron 3300+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌35.5% higher power demand at 84W vs 62W.

Sempron 3300+

2001

Why buy it

✅Draws 62W instead of 84W, a 22W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (412 vs 418).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron D 352 better than Sempron 3300+?

Yes. Celeron D 352 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 1.5% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron D 352 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 60% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron D 352 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron D 352 is the better buy right now. Celeron D 352 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $69 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron D 352 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron D 352 vs Sempron 3300+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron 3300+

The Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 412 points. Launch price was $30.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron D 352 and Sempron 3300+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3300+ — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Celeron D 352 uses the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 3300+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron D 352 scores 418 against the Sempron 3300+'s 412 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron D 352. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron D 352	Sempron 3300+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Cedar Mill (2006)	Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark	418+1%	412
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron D 352 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3300+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron D 352	Sempron 3300+
Socket	LGA775	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Celeron D 352) / not specified (Sempron 3300+). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.