Celeron D 352
VS
Sempron 3300+

Celeron D 352 vs Sempron 3300+

Intel

Celeron D 352

1 Cores1 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2006
VS
AMD

Sempron 3300+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 2 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron D 352 is positioned at rank 1062 and the Sempron 3300+ is on rank 923, so the Sempron 3300+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron D 352

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
51438%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
48604%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
35290%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
10632%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
8421%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
7367%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
4219%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
4164%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3792%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3791%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3749%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3648%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3597%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3582%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3550%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
100%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
100%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
97%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
97%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
96%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
95%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
94%
#1069
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
93%
#1070
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
93%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
89%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
83%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
81%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
78%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
76%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
71%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
67%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3300+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
22703%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
21452%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15576%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4692%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3717%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3252%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1862%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1838%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1674%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1673%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1655%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1610%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1588%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1581%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1567%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
98%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
98%
#922
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
100%
#923
Sempron 3300+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#924
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
100%
#925
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
100%
#926
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
100%
#927
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
99%
#929
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
98%
#931
Pentium E6800
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#932
Core i3-530
MSRP: $113|Avg: $15
98%
#934
Core i3-2105
MSRP: $138|Avg: $30
97%
#935
Athlon II X3 405e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#936
Core i3-3225
MSRP: $172|Avg: $167
96%
#937
Athlon II X3 400e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron D 352 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Sempron 3300+ in both compute-intensive tasks (1.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron D 352Sempron 3300+
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Cedar Mill (2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron D 352Sempron 3300+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron D 352 and Sempron 3300+

Intel

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Sempron 3300+

The Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 412 points. Launch price was $30.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron D 352 and Sempron 3300+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3300+ — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Celeron D 352 uses the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 3300+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron D 352 scores 418 against the Sempron 3300+'s 412 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron D 352. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron D 352Sempron 3300+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+60%
2 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512K
Process
65 nm-50%
130 nm
Architecture
Cedar Mill (2006)
Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark
418+1%
412
Geekbench 6 Single
180
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron D 352 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3300+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron D 352Sempron 3300+
Socket
LGA775
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
800
Max RAM Capacity
4
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Celeron D 352) / not specified (Sempron 3300+). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeatureCeleron D 352Sempron 3300+
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false
Target Use
Budget