Celeron 420 vs Celeron D 352

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 420 vs Celeron D 352 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 420 vs Celeron D 352: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 420

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($39 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
✅Delivers 79.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($39 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 84W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.

Celeron D 352

2006

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron 420.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 420 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (418 vs 425).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 10.9 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $39 MSRP).
❌140% higher power demand at 84W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 420 better than Celeron D 352?

Yes. Celeron 420 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 420 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 420 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 420 is the better buy right now. Celeron 420 comes in $30 cheaper on MSRP at $39 MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 79.9% better value on MSRP (10.9 vs 6.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 420 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 420 vs Celeron D 352 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 420

The Celeron 420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $23.

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 420 and Celeron D 352 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 420 versus 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Celeron 420 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron D 352 uses Cedar Mill (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 420 scores 425 against the Celeron D 352's 418 — a 1.7% lead for the Celeron 420. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 420	Celeron D 352
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+100%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+100%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (total)	512 kB
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Conroe-L (2007−2008)	Cedar Mill (2006)
PassMark	425+2%	418
Geekbench 6 Single	—	180

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. The Celeron 420 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 945,G31,G41 (Celeron 420) and 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352).

Feature	Celeron 420	Celeron D 352
Socket	LGA775	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 420) vs false (Celeron D 352). Primary use case: Celeron 420 targets Budget, Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 420 rivals Pentium 4 2.80; Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

Feature	Celeron 420	Celeron D 352
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	false
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 420 was priced at $39, while the Celeron D 352 came in at $69. On launch pricing ($39 vs $69), Celeron 420 was $30 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 420 delivers 10.9 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the Celeron D 352 — making the Celeron 420 the 57.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 420	Celeron D 352
MSRP	$39-43%	$69
Performance per Dollar	10.9+79%	6.1
Release Date	2007	2006

Search Celeron 420 on Amazon

Search Celeron D 352 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.