Celeron 420 vs Pentium M 730

Intel

Celeron 420

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium M 730

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······

Celeron 420 vs Pentium M 730 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 420 vs Pentium M 730 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 420 vs Pentium M 730: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 420

2007

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (425 vs 435).
    • Launch MSRP is still $39 MSRP, while Pentium M 730 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 29.6% higher power demand at 35W vs 27W.

    Pentium M 730

    2005

    Why buy it

    • +2.4% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 27W instead of 35W, a 8W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium M 730 better than Celeron 420?
    Yes. Pentium M 730 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 2.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 730 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium M 730 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium M 730 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $39 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.4% higher PassMark. Celeron 420 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (10.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron 420 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Celeron 420 vs Pentium M 730 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron 420

    The Celeron 420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $23.

    Intel

    Pentium M 730

    The Pentium M 730 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 435 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Celeron 420 and Pentium M 730 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 420 versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 730 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron 420 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium M 730 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 420 scores 425 against the Pentium M 730's 435 — a 2.3% lead for the Pentium M 730. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureCeleron 420Pentium M 730
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.6 GHz
    1.6 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.6 GHz
    1.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB (total)
    2 MB+300%
    Process
    65 nm-28%
    90 nm
    Architecture
    Conroe-L (2007−2008)
    Dothan (2004−2005)
    PassMark
    425
    435+2%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Celeron 420 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 730 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCeleron 420Pentium M 730
    Socket
    LGA775
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-800
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: No (Celeron 420) / not specified (Pentium M 730). Primary use case: Celeron 420 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 420 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

    FeatureCeleron 420Pentium M 730
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    No
    Target Use
    Budget