Celeron D 352 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron D 352 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron D 352 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron D 352

2006

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Mobile Pentium 4 2.80.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (418 vs 428).
❌Launch MSRP is still $69 MSRP, while Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌23.5% higher power demand at 84W vs 68W.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

2003

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 68W instead of 84W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.

Quick Answers

So, is Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 better than Celeron D 352?

Yes. Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron D 352 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (6.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron D 352 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron D 352 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron D 352 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 versus 2.8 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Celeron D 352 uses the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron D 352 scores 418 against the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80's 428 — a 2.4% lead for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron D 352	Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+14%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Cedar Mill (2006)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	418	428+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron D 352 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron D 352	Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
Socket	LGA775	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Celeron D 352) / not specified (Mobile Pentium 4 2.80). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.