Celeron D 352 vs Pentium 4 2.80

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron D 352 vs Pentium 4 2.80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron D 352 vs Pentium 4 2.80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron D 352

2006

Why buy it

✅Costs $258 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $327 MSRP).
✅Delivers 385.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $327 MSRP).
✅Draws 84W instead of 110W, a 26W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium 4 2.80.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 4 2.80

2002

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (408 vs 418).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($327 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
❌31% higher power demand at 110W vs 84W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron D 352 better than Pentium 4 2.80?

Yes. Celeron D 352 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron D 352 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron D 352 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron D 352 is the better buy right now. Celeron D 352 comes in $258 cheaper on MSRP at $69 MSRP versus $327 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 385.5% better value on MSRP (6.1 vs 1.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron D 352 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2002) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron D 352 vs Pentium 4 2.80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium 4 2.80

The Pentium 4 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron D 352 and Pentium 4 2.80 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 versus 2.79 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.80 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Celeron D 352 uses the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron D 352 scores 418 against the Pentium 4 2.80's 408 — a 2.4% lead for the Celeron D 352. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron D 352	Pentium 4 2.80
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+15%	2.79 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Cedar Mill (2006)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	418+2%	408
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron D 352 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron D 352	Pentium 4 2.80
Socket	LGA775	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Celeron D 352) / not specified (Pentium 4 2.80). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

Feature	Celeron D 352	Pentium 4 2.80
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	false	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron D 352 was priced at $69, while the Pentium 4 2.80 came in at $327. On launch pricing ($69 vs $327), Celeron D 352 was $258 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron D 352 delivers 6.1 pts/$ vs 1.2 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 2.80 — making the Celeron D 352 the 131.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron D 352	Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP	$69-79%	$327
Performance per Dollar	6.1+408%	1.2
Release Date	2006	2002

Search Celeron D 352 on Amazon

Search Pentium 4 2.80 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.