CPU
GPU
Celeron D 352
Celeron 540
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron D 352 is positioned at rank 1062 and the Celeron 540 is on rank 1212, so the Celeron D 352 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron D 352
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 540
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron D 352 | Celeron 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Cedar Mill (2006) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron D 352 | Celeron 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+193%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron D 352 and Celeron 540
Celeron D 352
The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron 540
The Celeron 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron D 352 is built on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron D 352 scores 418 against the Celeron 540's 408 — a 2.4% lead for the Celeron D 352. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron D 352 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 540.
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | Celeron 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | — |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+72% | 1.86 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | — |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Cedar Mill (2006) | — |
| PassMark | 418+2% | 408 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron D 352 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 540 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron D 352 versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron 540 — the Celeron D 352 supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352) and Santa Rosa (Celeron 540).
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | Celeron 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 800+39900% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 | 4 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Celeron D 352) vs No (Celeron 540). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget, Celeron 540 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80; Celeron 540 rivals Pentium T2310.
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | Celeron 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | No |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Celeron D 352 launched at $69 MSRP, while the Celeron 540 debuted at $86. At current prices ($15 vs $5), the Celeron 540 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron D 352 delivers 27.9 pts/$ vs 81.6 pts/$ for the Celeron 540 — making the Celeron 540 the 98.2% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | Celeron 540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-20% | $86 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $5-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.9 | 81.6+192% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron D 352 and Celeron 540
