Core i7-13700K
VS
VIA Nano U2250

Core i7-13700K vs VIA Nano U2250

Intel

Core i7-13700K

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022
VS

VIA Nano U2250

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700K

#131
Core Ultra 5 245T
MSRP: $270|Avg: $270
105%
#132
Core i5-8500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $80
104%
#133
Core i5-9400F
MSRP: $182|Avg: $80
103%
#134
Core i5-11400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $141
103%
#135
Core i5-13600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $319
103%
#136
Core i5-13500
MSRP: $242|Avg: $264
103%
#137
Ryzen 7 8700G
MSRP: $329|Avg: $269
103%
#138
Core i7-14700
MSRP: $384|Avg: $348
103%
#139
Ryzen 5 2500X
MSRP: $159|Avg: $80
103%
#140
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
102%
#141
Core i9-13900K
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
102%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
101%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
100%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
100%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
100%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
100%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
99%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
99%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
99%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
98%
#151
Core Ultra 7 265T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $362
98%
#152
Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $85|Avg: $64
98%
#153
Core i3-9100T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
98%
#154
Ryzen 5 4600G
MSRP: $154|Avg: $143
98%
#155
Core i7-13700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
97%
#156
Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $350
97%
#157
Core i7-13700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $345
97%
#158
Core i5-13600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
97%
#159
Ryzen 5 3400GE
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
96%
#160
Core i7-12700F
MSRP: $314|Avg: $275
96%
#161
Core i5-9400
MSRP: $192|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar VIA Nano U2250

#1106
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3452%
#1107
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3401%
#1108
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3122%
#1109
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3108%
#1110
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3080%
#1112
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2974%
#1113
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2852%
#1114
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2847%
#1115
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2771%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1120
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1121
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#1122
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1124
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#1125
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
97%
#1126
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
97%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
97%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1129
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
96%
#1130
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
96%
#1131
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1132
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-13700K (2022) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-13700KVIA Nano U2250
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Isaiah (2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The VIA Nano U2250 (2009) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-13700KVIA Nano U2250
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+169%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and VIA Nano U2250

Intel

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

VIA Nano U2250

The VIA Nano U2250 is manufactured by VIA. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Isaiah (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the VIA Nano U2250 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 15 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 1.5 GHz on the VIA Nano U2250 — a 113% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K. The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the VIA Nano U2250 uses Isaiah (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the VIA Nano U2250's 425 — a 196.3% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 150, a 180% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 150 (196.9% advantage for the Core i7-13700K).

FeatureCore i7-13700KVIA Nano U2250
Cores / Threads
16 / 24+1500%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+260%
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB
Process
Intel 7 nm-89%
65 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Isaiah (2009)
PassMark
45,784+10673%
425
Cinebench R23 Multi
31,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,846+1797%
150
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,980+12553%
150
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the VIA Nano U2250 uses NanoBGA2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR3-1333 on the VIA Nano U2250 — the Core i7-13700K supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 1 (VIA Nano U2250). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 1 (VIA Nano U2250) — the Core i7-13700K offers 19 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and VX900 (VIA Nano U2250).

FeatureCore i7-13700KVIA Nano U2250
Socket
LGA1700
NanoBGA2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+67%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+4700%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20+1900%
1
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x (VIA Nano U2250). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the VIA Nano U2250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: VIA Nano U2250 targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

FeatureCore i7-13700KVIA Nano U2250
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 770
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x
Target Use
Embedded
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the VIA Nano U2250 debuted at $50. At current prices ($400 vs $10), the VIA Nano U2250 is $390 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 42.5 pts/$ for the VIA Nano U2250 — making the Core i7-13700K the 91.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-13700KVIA Nano U2250
MSRP
$409
$50-88%
Avg Price (30d)
$400
$10-98%
Performance per Dollar
114.5+169%
42.5
Release Date
2022
2009