GX-210JA vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

GX-210JA vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 Performance Spectrum

GX-210JA

2 / 2

425

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

1 / 2

428

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

GX-210JA vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GX-210JA vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

GX-210JA

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 68W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (425 vs 428).

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌6700% higher power demand at 68W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 better than GX-210JA?

Yes. Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 still makes the most sense overall. Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GX-210JA makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

GX-210JA vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GX-210JA

The GX-210JA is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The GX-210JA packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the GX-210JA has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the GX-210JA versus 2.8 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 — a 94.7% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80. The GX-210JA uses the Temash (2013) architecture (28 nm), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the GX-210JA scores 425 against the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80's 428 — a 0.7% lead for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80.

Feature	GX-210JA	Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1 GHz	2.8 GHz+180%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm-78%	130 nm
Architecture	Temash (2013)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	425	428

🧠

Memory & Platform

The GX-210JA uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.