GX-210JA
VS
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

GX-210JA vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

AMD

GX-210JA

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2004

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GX-210JA is positioned at rank 1119 and the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is on rank 1157, so the GX-210JA offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GX-210JA

#1107
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3452%
#1108
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3401%
#1109
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3122%
#1110
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3108%
#1111
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3080%
#1113
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2974%
#1114
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2852%
#1115
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2847%
#1116
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2771%
#1119
GX-210JA
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1120
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
97%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
97%
#1128
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
97%
#1129
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
96%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
96%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

#1144
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4121%
#1145
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4060%
#1146
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3728%
#1147
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3711%
#1148
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3677%
#1150
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3551%
#1151
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3404%
#1152
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3399%
#1153
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3308%
#1156
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
100%
#1157
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1158
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1159
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1161
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1163
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
96%
#1164
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1165
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1166
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
95%
#1167
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1169
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#1170
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1171
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The GX-210JA (2013) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightGX-210JAMobile Athlon 64 2800+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Oakville (2003−2004) / Standard Node)

💎 Value Proposition

The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ (2004) relies on older node technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightGX-210JAMobile Athlon 64 2800+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GX-210JA and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

AMD

GX-210JA

The GX-210JA is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The GX-210JA packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the GX-210JA has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the GX-210JA versus 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. The GX-210JA uses the Temash (2013) architecture (28 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses Oakville (2003−2004). In PassMark, the GX-210JA scores 425 against the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+'s 420 — a 1.2% lead for the GX-210JA.

FeatureGX-210JAMobile Athlon 64 2800+
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1 GHz
1.8 GHz+80%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512K
Process
28 nm
Architecture
Temash (2013)
Oakville (2003−2004)
PassMark
425+1%
420
🧠

Memory & Platform

The GX-210JA uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureGX-210JAMobile Athlon 64 2800+
Socket
FT3
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
400
Max RAM Capacity
2
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (GX-210JA) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.

FeatureGX-210JAMobile Athlon 64 2800+
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false