Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 1.60

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Pentium M 1.60

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 1.60 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
1 / 1
420
+3.7%
brand logoAthlon XP 1800+
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoAthlon XP 2500+
brand logoAthlon XP 2700+
brand logoRyzen AI 5 340
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Pentium M 1.60
1 / 1
405
0.0%
brand logoPentium 4 1.80
brand logoAtom N270
brand logoPentium M 1.30
brand logoCore Solo T1200
brand logoCore i9-10900F
brand logoXeon W-3335
brand logoXeon w7-3545
brand logoXeon w9-3575X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 1.60 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.60
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.60
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.60
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.60
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.60
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.60
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.60
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.60
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.60
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Civilization VI

Civilization VI

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.60
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 1.60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

2004

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌2033.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 24W.

    Pentium M 1.60

    2003

    Why buy it

    • ✅Draws 24W instead of 512W, a 488W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 420).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ better than Pentium M 1.60?
    Yes. Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 46 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ still makes the most sense overall. Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2004 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 1.60 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

    The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Pentium M 1.60

    The Pentium M 1.60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Pentium M 1.60 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 1.60 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Pentium M 1.60 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Pentium M 1.60's 405 — a 3.6% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium M 1.60
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.8 GHz+12%
    1.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    —
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512K+51100%
    1 MB
    Process
    —
    130 nm
    Architecture
    Oakville (2003−2004)
    Banias (2003)
    PassMark
    420+4%
    405
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 1.60 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium M 1.60
    Socket
    754
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    400
    —
    Max RAM Capacity
    2
    —
    RAM Channels
    1
    —
    ECC Support
    No
    —
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    —
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+) / not specified (Pentium M 1.60). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium M 1.60
    Integrated GPU
    No
    —
    IGPU Model
    None
    —
    Unlocked
    No
    —
    AVX-512
    No
    —
    Virtualization
    false
    —