Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Opteron 140

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Opteron 140

1 Cores1 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Opteron 140 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
1 / 1
420
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 1800+
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoAthlon XP 2500+
brand logoAthlon XP 2700+
brand logoRyzen AI 5 340
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Opteron 140
1 / 1
428
+1.9%
brand logoAthlon XP 1900+
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoAthlon 64 2000+
brand logoAthlon MP 2800+
brand logoRyzen AI 5 340
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Opteron 140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Opteron 140
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Opteron 140
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Opteron 140
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Opteron 140
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Opteron 140
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Opteron 140
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Opteron 140
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Opteron 140
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Opteron 140
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Opteron 140
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Opteron 140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

2004

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 140 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (420 vs 428).
    • ❌502.4% higher power demand at 512W vs 85W.

    Opteron 140

    2003

    Why buy it

    • ✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ✅Draws 85W instead of 512W, a 427W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Opteron 140 better than Mobile Athlon 64 2800+?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 140 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Opteron 140 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 140 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Opteron 140 still makes the most sense overall. Opteron 140 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2004 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Opteron 140 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

    The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Opteron 140

    The Opteron 140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $596.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Opteron 140 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ versus 1.4 GHz on the Opteron 140 — a 25% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Opteron 140 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Opteron 140's 428 — a 1.9% lead for the Opteron 140.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2800+Opteron 140
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.8 GHz+29%
    1.4 GHz
    L3 Cache
    —
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512K+51100%
    1 MB
    Process
    —
    130 nm
    Architecture
    Oakville (2003−2004)
    SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
    PassMark
    420
    428+2%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Opteron 140 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2800+Opteron 140
    Socket
    754
    940
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    400
    —
    Max RAM Capacity
    2
    —
    RAM Channels
    1
    —
    ECC Support
    No
    —
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    —
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+) / not specified (Opteron 140). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2800+Opteron 140
    Integrated GPU
    No
    —
    IGPU Model
    None
    —
    Unlocked
    No
    —
    AVX-512
    No
    —
    Virtualization
    false
    —