Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Sempron 3300+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Sempron 3300+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Sempron 3300+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Sempron 3300+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
2004Why buy it
- ✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌725.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 62W.
Sempron 3300+
2001Why buy it
- ✅Draws 62W instead of 512W, a 450W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (412 vs 420).
Quick Answers
So, is Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ better than Sempron 3300+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Sempron 3300+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.
Sempron 3300+
The Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 412 points. Launch price was $30.
Processing Power
Both the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Sempron 3300+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3300+ — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Sempron 3300+. The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Sempron 3300+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Sempron 3300+'s 412 — a 1.9% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Sempron 3300+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 512K |
| Process | — | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Oakville (2003−2004) | Palermo (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 420+2% | 412 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Sempron 3300+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+) / not specified (Sempron 3300+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Sempron 3300+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Sempron 3300+
