Pentium M 1.60 vs Sempron 3300+

Pentium M 1.60 vs Sempron 3300+ Performance Spectrum

Pentium M 1.60

1 / 1

405

0.0%

412

+1.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 1.60 vs Sempron 3300+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 1.60 vs Sempron 3300+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 1.60

2003

Why buy it

✅Draws 24W instead of 62W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 412).

Sempron 3300+

2001

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌158.3% higher power demand at 62W vs 24W.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 3300+ better than Pentium M 1.60?

Yes. Sempron 3300+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 1.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron 3300+ has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 25% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3300+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 3300+ still makes the most sense overall. Sempron 3300+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.7% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 1.60 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2003 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium M 1.60 vs Sempron 3300+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 1.60

The Pentium M 1.60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron 3300+

The Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 412 points. Launch price was $30.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 1.60 and Sempron 3300+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 1.60 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3300+ — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Sempron 3300+. The Pentium M 1.60 uses the Banias (2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 3300+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 1.60 scores 405 against the Sempron 3300+'s 412 — a 1.7% lead for the Sempron 3300+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 1.60	Sempron 3300+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K+51100%
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	Banias (2003)	Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark	405	412+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 1.60 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3300+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.