Pentium M 1.70 vs VIA Nano U2250

Intel

Pentium M 1.70

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
VS

VIA Nano U2250

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Pentium M 1.70 vs VIA Nano U2250 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 1.70 vs VIA Nano U2250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 1.70 vs VIA Nano U2250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 1.70

2003

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • 2300% higher power demand at 24W vs 1W.

    VIA Nano U2250

    2009

    Why buy it

    • Draws 1W instead of 24W, a 23W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (425 vs 435).
    • Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Pentium M 1.70 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium M 1.70 better than VIA Nano U2250?
    Yes. Pentium M 1.70 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 2.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 1.70 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 13.3% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 1.70 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium M 1.70 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium M 1.70 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.4% higher PassMark. VIA Nano U2250 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (8.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on NanoBGA2.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    VIA Nano U2250 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Pentium M 1.70 vs VIA Nano U2250 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium M 1.70

    The Pentium M 1.70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 435 points. Launch price was $69.

    VIA Nano U2250

    The VIA Nano U2250 is manufactured by VIA. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Isaiah (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Pentium M 1.70 and VIA Nano U2250 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 1.70 versus 1.5 GHz on the VIA Nano U2250 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Pentium M 1.70. The Pentium M 1.70 uses the Banias (2003) architecture (130 nm), while the VIA Nano U2250 uses Isaiah (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 1.70 scores 435 against the VIA Nano U2250's 425 — a 2.3% lead for the Pentium M 1.70.

    FeaturePentium M 1.70VIA Nano U2250
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.7 GHz+13%
    1.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    1 MB
    Process
    130 nm
    65 nm-50%
    Architecture
    Banias (2003)
    Isaiah (2009)
    PassMark
    435+2%
    425
    Geekbench 6 Single
    150
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    150
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium M 1.70 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the VIA Nano U2250 uses NanoBGA2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium M 1.70VIA Nano U2250
    Socket
    PGA478
    NanoBGA2
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1333
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    1
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Pentium M 1.70) / VT-x (VIA Nano U2250). Primary use case: VIA Nano U2250 targets Embedded.

    FeaturePentium M 1.70VIA Nano U2250
    Integrated GPU
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Embedded