Pentium M 725
VS
Athlon 5150

Pentium M 725 vs Athlon 5150

Intel

Pentium M 725

1 Cores1 Thrd21 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2004
VS
AMD

Athlon 5150

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 725 is positioned at rank 141 and the Athlon 5150 is on rank 314, so the Pentium M 725 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 725

#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
99%
#129
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
314%
#130
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
310%
#131
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
284%
#132
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
283%
#133
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
280%
#135
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
271%
#136
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
260%
#137
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
259%
#138
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
252%
#141
Pentium M 725
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#147
Atom N2800
MSRP: $47|Avg: $3
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 5150

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4626%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4371%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3174%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
956%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
757%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
663%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
379%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
375%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
341%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
341%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
337%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
328%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
323%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
322%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
319%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
100%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
99%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
98%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
98%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
98%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
98%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
98%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
98%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
98%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
98%
#314
Athlon 5150
MSRP: $21|Avg: $21
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon 5150 (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium M 725Athlon 5150
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($21)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium M 725 (2004) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium M 725Athlon 5150
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($21)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 725 and Athlon 5150

Intel

Pentium M 725

The Pentium M 725 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,400 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon 5150

The Athlon 5150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,415 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Pentium M 725 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Athlon 5150 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon 5150 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 725 versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 5150 — identical boost frequencies. The Pentium M 725 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon 5150 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 725 scores 1,400 against the Athlon 5150's 1,415 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon 5150.

FeaturePentium M 725Athlon 5150
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2048 kB
Process
90 nm
28 nm-69%
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,400
1,415+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
150
Geekbench 6 Multi
150
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 725 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 5150 uses AM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Pentium M 725 versus 1600 on the Athlon 5150 — the Athlon 5150 supports 305.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 5150 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 2 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Pentium M 725) vs 4 (Athlon 5150) — the Athlon 5150 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 855PM (Pentium M 725) and AM1 (Athlon 5150).

FeaturePentium M 725Athlon 5150
Socket
PGA478
AM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-333
1600
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB+13107100%
16
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Pentium M 725) vs true (Athlon 5150). The Athlon 5150 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3 Graphics), while the Pentium M 725 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium M 725 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon 5150 rivals Pentium J2900.

FeaturePentium M 725Athlon 5150
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Radeon R3 Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
None
true
Target Use
Legacy Laptop