Pentium M 725 vs Turion II Neo K685

Pentium M 725 vs Turion II Neo K685 Performance Spectrum

Pentium M 725

1 / 1

1,400

0.0%

Celeron B820

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

1,424

+1.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 725 vs Turion II Neo K685 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 725 vs Turion II Neo K685: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 725

2004

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion II Neo K685 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,400 vs 1,424).
❌2000% higher power demand at 21W vs 1W.

Turion II Neo K685

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 21W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II Neo K685 better than Pentium M 725?

Yes. Turion II Neo K685 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion II Neo K685 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II Neo K685 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II Neo K685 still makes the most sense overall. Turion II Neo K685 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion II Neo K685 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2004) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium M 725 vs Turion II Neo K685 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 725

The Pentium M 725 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,400 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion II Neo K685

The Turion II Neo K685 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,424 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium M 725 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Turion II Neo K685 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Turion II Neo K685 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 725 versus 1.8 GHz on the Turion II Neo K685 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Turion II Neo K685. The Pentium M 725 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Turion II Neo K685 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 725 scores 1,400 against the Turion II Neo K685's 1,424 — a 1.7% lead for the Turion II Neo K685.

Feature	Pentium M 725	Turion II Neo K685
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Process	90 nm	45 nm-50%
Architecture	Dothan (2004−2005)	Geneva (2010)
PassMark	1,400	1,424+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	150	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	150	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 725 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion II Neo K685 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.