Athlon 5150 vs Pentium M 725

Athlon 5150 vs Pentium M 725 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 5150

4 / 4

1,415

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 725

1 / 1

1,400

0.0%

Celeron B820

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5150 vs Pentium M 725 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5150 vs Pentium M 725: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5150

2014

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3 Graphics, while Pentium M 725 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium M 725.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $21 MSRP, while Pentium M 725 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌19% higher power demand at 25W vs 21W.

Pentium M 725

2004

Why buy it

✅Draws 21W instead of 25W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,400 vs 1,415).
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5150 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5150.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 5150 better than Pentium M 725?

Yes. Athlon 5150 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 5150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 5150 is the better buy right now. Athlon 5150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $21 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (67.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 5150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2004) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 5150 vs Pentium M 725 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5150

The Athlon 5150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,415 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium M 725

The Pentium M 725 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,400 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 5150 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium M 725 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon 5150 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 5150 versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 725 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 5150 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium M 725 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5150 scores 1,415 against the Pentium M 725's 1,400 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon 5150.

Feature	Athlon 5150	Pentium M 725
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2 MB
Process	28 nm-69%	90 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,415+1%	1,400
Geekbench 6 Single	—	150
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	150

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 5150 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 725 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Athlon 5150 versus DDR-333 on the Pentium M 725 — the Athlon 5150 supports -580.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 5150 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Athlon 5150) vs 0 (Pentium M 725) — the Athlon 5150 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM1 (Athlon 5150) and 855PM (Pentium M 725).

Feature	Athlon 5150	Pentium M 725
Socket	AM1	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+700%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon 5150) vs None (Pentium M 725). The Athlon 5150 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3 Graphics), while the Pentium M 725 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium M 725 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon 5150 rivals Pentium J2900.