A10 Micro-6700T vs Athlon 5150

A10 Micro-6700T vs Athlon 5150 Performance Spectrum

A10 Micro-6700T

4 / 4

1,426

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon 5150

4 / 4

1,415

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Athlon 5150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Athlon 5150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 Micro-6700T

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 25W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5150.

Athlon 5150

2014

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike A10 Micro-6700T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,415 vs 1,426).
❌Launch MSRP is still $21 MSRP, while A10 Micro-6700T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌400% higher power demand at 25W vs 5W.

Quick Answers

So, is A10 Micro-6700T better than Athlon 5150?

Yes. A10 Micro-6700T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10 Micro-6700T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10 Micro-6700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10 Micro-6700T is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10 Micro-6700T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $21 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 5150 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (67.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10 Micro-6700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Athlon 5150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 Micro-6700T

The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon 5150

The Athlon 5150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,415 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10 Micro-6700T and Athlon 5150 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 5150 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the A10 Micro-6700T. The A10 Micro-6700T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 5150 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Micro-6700T scores 1,426 against the Athlon 5150's 1,415 — a 0.8% lead for the A10 Micro-6700T.

Feature	A10 Micro-6700T	Athlon 5150
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+38%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	—
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2048 kB
Process	28 nm	28 nm
Architecture	Mullins (2014)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,426	1,415
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 Micro-6700T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 5150 uses AM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 1600 on the Athlon 5150 — the Athlon 5150 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 5150 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 4 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A10 Micro-6700T	Athlon 5150
Socket	FT3	AM1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T) vs true (Athlon 5150). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10 Micro-6700T) and Radeon R3 Graphics (Athlon 5150) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770; Athlon 5150 rivals Pentium J2900.