A10 Micro-6700T vs Celeron N2805
A10 Micro-6700T
Celeron N2805
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10 Micro-6700T is positioned at rank 724 and the Celeron N2805 is on rank 250, so the Celeron N2805 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10 Micro-6700T
Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2805
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron N2805
A10 Micro-6700T
The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron N2805
The Celeron N2805 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 1.46 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The A10 Micro-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N2805 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 1.46 GHz on the Celeron N2805 — a 40.4% clock advantage for the A10 Micro-6700T (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.46 GHz). The A10 Micro-6700T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N2805 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Micro-6700T scores 1,426 against the Celeron N2805's 1,430 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron N2805.
| Feature | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+51% | 1.46 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 1.46 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Mullins (2014) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 1,426 | 1,430 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10 Micro-6700T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N2805 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 1066 on the Celeron N2805 — the Celeron N2805 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10 Micro-6700T supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 4 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | 1066+35433% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+209715100% | 4 |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T) vs true (Celeron N2805). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10 Micro-6700T) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2805) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770; Celeron N2805 rivals AMD E1-2100.
| Feature | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Tablet | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron N2805
