A10 Micro-6700T vs Athlon 64 X2 5000+

A10 Micro-6700T vs Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Performance Spectrum

A10 Micro-6700T

4 / 4

1,426

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

2 / 2

1,425

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Athlon 64 X2 5000+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Athlon 64 X2 5000+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 Micro-6700T

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 89W, a 84W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Athlon 64 X2 5000+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,425 vs 1,426).
❌Launch MSRP is still $136 MSRP, while A10 Micro-6700T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1680% higher power demand at 89W vs 5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10 Micro-6700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10 Micro-6700T better than Athlon 64 X2 5000+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A10 Micro-6700T pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10 Micro-6700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10 Micro-6700T is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10 Micro-6700T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $136 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. Athlon 64 X2 5000+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (10.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10 Micro-6700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 Micro-6700T

The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,425 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 Micro-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5000+. The A10 Micro-6700T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Micro-6700T scores 1,426 against the Athlon 64 X2 5000+'s 1,425 — a 0.1% lead for the A10 Micro-6700T.

Feature	A10 Micro-6700T	Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm-69%	90 nm
Architecture	Mullins (2014)	Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,426	1,425
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 Micro-6700T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A10 Micro-6700T versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ — the A10 Micro-6700T supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 2 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+). PCIe lanes: 4 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) — the A10 Micro-6700T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10 Micro-6700T	Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Socket	FT3	AM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+67%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5000+). The A10 Micro-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770.