A10 Micro-6700T
VS
Celeron N4000C

A10 Micro-6700T vs Celeron N4000C

AMD

A10 Micro-6700T

4 Cores4 Thrd5 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron N4000C

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10 Micro-6700T is positioned at rank 724 and the Celeron N4000C is on rank 721, so the Celeron N4000C offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10 Micro-6700T

#712
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1029%
#713
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1014%
#714
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
931%
#715
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
926%
#716
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
918%
#718
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
886%
#719
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
850%
#720
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
849%
#721
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
826%
#724
A10 Micro-6700T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N4000C

#708
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1026%
#709
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1011%
#710
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
928%
#711
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
924%
#712
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
915%
#714
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
884%
#715
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
848%
#716
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
846%
#717
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
823%
#721
Celeron N4000C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N4000C (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10 Micro-6700TCeleron N4000C
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10 Micro-6700T (2014) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10 Micro-6700TCeleron N4000C
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron N4000C

AMD

A10 Micro-6700T

The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron N4000C

The Celeron N4000C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A10 Micro-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N4000C offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000C — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Celeron N4000C (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A10 Micro-6700T is built on the Mullins (2014) architecture. In PassMark, the A10 Micro-6700T scores 1,426 against the Celeron N4000C's 1,430 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron N4000C.

FeatureA10 Micro-6700TCeleron N4000C
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz+18%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz+9%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
2048 kB
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Mullins (2014)
PassMark
1,426
1,430
Geekbench 6 Single
250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 Micro-6700T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N4000C uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA10 Micro-6700TCeleron N4000C
Socket
FT3
FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T) / not specified (Celeron N4000C). The A10 Micro-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Celeron N4000C requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770.

FeatureA10 Micro-6700TCeleron N4000C
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R6
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Tablet