A10 Micro-6700T
VS
Core 2 Duo T5270

A10 Micro-6700T vs Core 2 Duo T5270

AMD

A10 Micro-6700T

4 Cores4 Thrd5 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T5270

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10 Micro-6700T is positioned at rank 724 and the Core 2 Duo T5270 is on rank 47, so the Core 2 Duo T5270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10 Micro-6700T

#712
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1029%
#713
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1014%
#714
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
931%
#715
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
926%
#716
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
918%
#718
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
886%
#719
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
850%
#720
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
849%
#721
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
826%
#724
A10 Micro-6700T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5270

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
100%
#35
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
206%
#36
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
203%
#37
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
186%
#38
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
185%
#39
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
183%
#41
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
177%
#42
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
170%
#43
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
170%
#44
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
165%
#47
Core 2 Duo T5270
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A10 Micro-6700T (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-1333, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10 Micro-6700TCore 2 Duo T5270
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T5270 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10 Micro-6700TCore 2 Duo T5270
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10 Micro-6700T and Core 2 Duo T5270

AMD

A10 Micro-6700T

The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5270

The Core 2 Duo T5270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The A10 Micro-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5270 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5270 — a 44.4% clock advantage for the A10 Micro-6700T (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The A10 Micro-6700T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5270 uses Merom-2048 (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Micro-6700T scores 1,426 against the Core 2 Duo T5270's 1,427 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5270.

FeatureA10 Micro-6700TCore 2 Duo T5270
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+57%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
1.4 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
2048 kB
2 MB
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Mullins (2014)
Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,426
1,427
Geekbench 6 Single
250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 Micro-6700T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5270 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA10 Micro-6700TCore 2 Duo T5270
Socket
FT3
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T5270). The A10 Micro-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core 2 Duo T5270 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770.

FeatureA10 Micro-6700TCore 2 Duo T5270
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R6
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Tablet