A10 Micro-6700T vs Celeron 5205U
A10 Micro-6700T
Celeron 5205U
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10 Micro-6700T is positioned at rank 724 and the Celeron 5205U is on rank 1231, so the A10 Micro-6700T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10 Micro-6700T
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 5205U
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron 5205U |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron 5205U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron 5205U
A10 Micro-6700T
The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron 5205U
The Celeron 5205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,432 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The A10 Micro-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 5205U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 5205U — a 14.6% clock advantage for the A10 Micro-6700T (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A10 Micro-6700T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 5205U uses Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Micro-6700T scores 1,426 against the Celeron 5205U's 1,432 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 5205U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 385, a 42.5% lead for the Celeron 5205U that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron 5205U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+16% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz+58% |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Mullins (2014) | Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 1,426 | 1,432 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | 385+54% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 650 |
Memory & Platform
The A10 Micro-6700T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 5205U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A10 Micro-6700T versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron 5205U — the Celeron 5205U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 5205U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 2 (Celeron 5205U). PCIe lanes: 4 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 12 (Celeron 5205U) — the Celeron 5205U offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron 5205U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | FCBGA1528 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 64 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 12+200% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 5205U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10 Micro-6700T) and UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) (Celeron 5205U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet, Celeron 5205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770; Celeron 5205U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U.
| Feature | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron 5205U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Tablet | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron 5205U
