A10 Micro-6700T vs Celeron 5205U

A10 Micro-6700T vs Celeron 5205U Performance Spectrum

A10 Micro-6700T

4 / 4

1,426

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 5205U

2 / 2

1,432

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Celeron 5205U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Celeron 5205U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 Micro-6700T

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 15W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (250 vs 385).
❌Lower PassMark (1,426 vs 1,432).

Celeron 5205U

2019

Why buy it

✅+54% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅200% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌200% higher power demand at 15W vs 5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 5205U better than A10 Micro-6700T?

Yes. Celeron 5205U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 5205U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 5205U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 5205U still makes the most sense overall. Celeron 5205U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 5205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Celeron 5205U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 Micro-6700T

The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 5205U

The Celeron 5205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,432 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 Micro-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 5205U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 5205U — a 14.6% clock advantage for the A10 Micro-6700T (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A10 Micro-6700T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 5205U uses Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Micro-6700T scores 1,426 against the Celeron 5205U's 1,432 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 5205U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 385, a 42.5% lead for the Celeron 5205U that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A10 Micro-6700T	Celeron 5205U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+16%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	1.9 GHz+58%
L3 Cache	—	2 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+100%	1 MB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Mullins (2014)	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)
PassMark	1,426	1,432
Geekbench 6 Single	250	385+54%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	650

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 Micro-6700T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 5205U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A10 Micro-6700T versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron 5205U — the Celeron 5205U supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 5205U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 2 (Celeron 5205U). PCIe lanes: 4 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 12 (Celeron 5205U) — the Celeron 5205U offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10 Micro-6700T	Celeron 5205U
Socket	FT3	FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR4-2400+80%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	64 GB+700%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	12+200%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 5205U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10 Micro-6700T) and UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) (Celeron 5205U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet, Celeron 5205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770; Celeron 5205U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U.