
A10 Micro-6700T

Pentium D 820
A10 Micro-6700T vs Pentium D 820 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10 Micro-6700T vs Pentium D 820 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10 Micro-6700T vs Pentium D 820: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10 Micro-6700T
2014Why buy it
- ✅+50.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Pentium D 820 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌150% higher power demand at 5W vs 2W.
Pentium D 820
2005Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 5W, a 3W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (166 vs 250).
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,412 vs 1,426).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $241 MSRP, while A10 Micro-6700T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10 Micro-6700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A10 Micro-6700T better than Pentium D 820?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10 Micro-6700T vs Pentium D 820 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 Micro-6700T
The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium D 820
The Pentium D 820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,412 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The A10 Micro-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium D 820 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium D 820 — a 24% clock advantage for the Pentium D 820 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A10 Micro-6700T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium D 820 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Micro-6700T scores 1,426 against the Pentium D 820's 1,412 — a 1% lead for the A10 Micro-6700T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 166, a 40.4% lead for the A10 Micro-6700T that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A10 Micro-6700T | Pentium D 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+133% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 2 MB |
| Process | 28 nm-69% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Mullins (2014) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 1,426 | 1,412 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250+51% | 166 |
Memory & Platform
The A10 Micro-6700T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium D 820 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A10 Micro-6700T versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium D 820 — the A10 Micro-6700T supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10 Micro-6700T supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 2 (Pentium D 820). PCIe lanes: 4 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 0 (Pentium D 820) — the A10 Micro-6700T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10 Micro-6700T | Pentium D 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+100% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T) vs No (Pentium D 820). The A10 Micro-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Pentium D 820 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770.
| Feature | A10 Micro-6700T | Pentium D 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | No |
| Target Use | Tablet | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















