A10 Micro-6700T
VS
Pentium D 820

A10 Micro-6700T vs Pentium D 820

AMD

A10 Micro-6700T

4 Cores4 Thrd5 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Pentium D 820

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10 Micro-6700T is positioned at rank 724 and the Pentium D 820 is on rank 1065, so the A10 Micro-6700T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10 Micro-6700T

#712
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1029%
#713
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1014%
#714
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
931%
#715
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
926%
#716
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
918%
#718
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
886%
#719
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
850%
#720
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
849%
#721
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
826%
#724
A10 Micro-6700T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium D 820

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
53194%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
50263%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
36495%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
10994%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
8709%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
7618%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
4363%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
4306%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3921%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3921%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3877%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3772%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3720%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3705%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3671%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
100%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
99%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
99%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
98%
#1069
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
96%
#1070
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
96%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
92%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
85%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
84%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
81%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
79%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
73%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
69%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
68%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
67%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
67%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A10 Micro-6700T (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-1333, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10 Micro-6700TPentium D 820
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium D 820 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10 Micro-6700TPentium D 820
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10 Micro-6700T and Pentium D 820

AMD

A10 Micro-6700T

The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium D 820

The Pentium D 820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,412 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A10 Micro-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium D 820 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium D 820 — a 24% clock advantage for the Pentium D 820 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A10 Micro-6700T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium D 820 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Micro-6700T scores 1,426 against the Pentium D 820's 1,412 — a 1% lead for the A10 Micro-6700T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 166, a 40.4% lead for the A10 Micro-6700T that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA10 Micro-6700TPentium D 820
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
2.8 GHz+133%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2048 kB
2 MB
Process
28 nm-69%
90 nm
Architecture
Mullins (2014)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
1,426
1,412
Geekbench 6 Single
250+51%
166
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 Micro-6700T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium D 820 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A10 Micro-6700T versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium D 820 — the A10 Micro-6700T supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10 Micro-6700T supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 2 (Pentium D 820). PCIe lanes: 4 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 0 (Pentium D 820) — the A10 Micro-6700T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA10 Micro-6700TPentium D 820
Socket
FT3
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+50%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T) vs No (Pentium D 820). The A10 Micro-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Pentium D 820 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770.

FeatureA10 Micro-6700TPentium D 820
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R6
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
No
Target Use
Tablet