A10 Micro-6700T vs Celeron G555
A10 Micro-6700T
Celeron G555
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10 Micro-6700T is positioned at rank 724 and the Celeron G555 is on rank 634, so the Celeron G555 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10 Micro-6700T
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G555
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron G555 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron G555 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron G555
A10 Micro-6700T
The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron G555
The Celeron G555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $89.
Processing Power
The A10 Micro-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G555 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G555 — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G555 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A10 Micro-6700T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G555 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Micro-6700T scores 1,426 against the Celeron G555's 1,427 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G555. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 398, a 45.7% lead for the Celeron G555 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron G555 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+125% |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Mullins (2014) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,426 | 1,427 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | 398+59% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 742 |
Memory & Platform
The A10 Micro-6700T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G555 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G555 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 2 (Celeron G555). PCIe lanes: 4 (A10 Micro-6700T) vs 16 (Celeron G555) — the Celeron G555 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron G555 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 16+300% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T) vs VT-x (Celeron G555). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10 Micro-6700T) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G555) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet, Celeron G555 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770; Celeron G555 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | A10 Micro-6700T | Celeron G555 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Tablet | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron G555
