Athlon 5150 vs Celeron N4000C

Athlon 5150 vs Celeron N4000C Performance Spectrum

Athlon 5150

4 / 4

1,415

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N4000C

2 / 2

1,430

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5150 vs Celeron N4000C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5150 vs Celeron N4000C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5150

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3 Graphics, while Celeron N4000C needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron N4000C.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,415 vs 1,430).
❌Launch MSRP is still $21 MSRP, while Celeron N4000C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌316.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 6W.

Celeron N4000C

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 25W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5150 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5150.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4000C better than Athlon 5150?

Yes. Celeron N4000C is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N4000C is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4000C is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4000C is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N4000C comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $21 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 5150 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (67.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4000C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 5150 vs Celeron N4000C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5150

The Athlon 5150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,415 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron N4000C

The Celeron N4000C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 5150 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N4000C offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon 5150 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 5150 versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000C — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Celeron N4000C. The Athlon 5150 is built on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 5150 scores 1,415 against the Celeron N4000C's 1,430 — a 1.1% lead for the Celeron N4000C.

Feature	Athlon 5150	Celeron N4000C
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.6 GHz+63%
Base Clock	—	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	—
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	1,415	1,430+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 5150 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N4000C uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 5150	Celeron N4000C
Socket	AM1	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon 5150) / not specified (Celeron N4000C). The Athlon 5150 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3 Graphics), while the Celeron N4000C requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 5150 rivals Pentium J2900.