Athlon 5150 vs Core i5-2467M

Athlon 5150 vs Core i5-2467M Performance Spectrum

Athlon 5150

4 / 4

1,415

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-2467M

2 / 4

1,410

0.0%

Celeron B820

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5150 vs Core i5-2467M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5150 vs Core i5-2467M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5150

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i5-2467M.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $21 MSRP, while Core i5-2467M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌47.1% higher power demand at 25W vs 17W.

Core i5-2467M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 25W, a 8W reduction.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,410 vs 1,415).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5150.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 5150 better than Core i5-2467M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-2467M is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 5150 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 5150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 5150 is the better buy right now. Athlon 5150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $21 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-2467M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (67.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 5150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 5150 vs Core i5-2467M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5150

The Athlon 5150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,415 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-2467M

The Core i5-2467M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,410 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 5150 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-2467M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon 5150 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 5150 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-2467M — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-2467M. The Athlon 5150 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-2467M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5150 scores 1,415 against the Core i5-2467M's 1,410 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 5150.

Feature	Athlon 5150	Core i5-2467M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.3 GHz+44%
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,415	1,410

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 5150 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2467M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Athlon 5150 versus 1333 on the Core i5-2467M — the Athlon 5150 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 5150) vs 2 (Core i5-2467M). PCIe lanes: 4 (Athlon 5150) vs 16 (Core i5-2467M) — the Core i5-2467M offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM1 (Athlon 5150) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i5-2467M).

Feature	Athlon 5150	Core i5-2467M
Socket	AM1	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+20%	1333
Max RAM Capacity	16	16
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R3 Graphics (Athlon 5150) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2467M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 5150 rivals Pentium J2900; Core i5-2467M rivals Core i5-2410M.