Pentium 3825U vs Pentium M 725

Intel

Pentium 3825U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium M 725

1 Cores1 Thrd21 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······

Pentium 3825U vs Pentium M 725 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 3825U vs Pentium M 725 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 3825U vs Pentium M 725: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 3825U

2015

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,396 vs 1,400).
    • 2338.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 21W.

    Pentium M 725

    2004

    Why buy it

    • +0.3% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 21W instead of 512W, a 491W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium M 725 better than Pentium 3825U?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium 3825U is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 725 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 725 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium M 725 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 725 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium 3825U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Pentium 3825U vs Pentium M 725 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium 3825U

    The Pentium 3825U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,396 points. Launch price was $161.

    Intel

    Pentium M 725

    The Pentium M 725 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,400 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Pentium 3825U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium M 725 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Pentium 3825U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3825U versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 725 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Pentium 3825U (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Pentium 3825U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium M 725 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 3825U scores 1,396 against the Pentium M 725's 1,400 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium M 725. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3825U vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 725.

    FeaturePentium 3825UPentium M 725
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4+100%
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.9 GHz+19%
    1.6 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.9 GHz+19%
    1.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    2 MB (total)
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)+12700%
    2 MB
    Process
    14 nm-84%
    90 nm
    Architecture
    Broadwell-U (2015)
    Dothan (2004−2005)
    PassMark
    1,396
    1,400
    Geekbench 6 Single
    150
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    150
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium 3825U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 725 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium 3825UPentium M 725
    Socket
    FCBGA1168
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+173%
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR-333
    Max RAM Capacity
    2 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Pentium 3825U) / None (Pentium M 725). Primary use case: Pentium M 725 targets Legacy Laptop.

    FeaturePentium 3825UPentium M 725
    Integrated GPU
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    None
    Target Use
    Legacy Laptop