Core i5-2467M vs Pentium 3825U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-2467M vs Pentium 3825U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-2467M vs Pentium 3825U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-2467M

2011

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 17W instead of 512W, a 495W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Pentium 3825U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 3825U

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,396 vs 1,410).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌2911.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2467M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-2467M better than Pentium 3825U?

Yes. Core i5-2467M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-2467M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2467M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-2467M still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-2467M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 3825U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-2467M vs Pentium 3825U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2467M

The Core i5-2467M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,410 points. Launch price was $250.

Pentium 3825U

The Pentium 3825U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,396 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-2467M and Pentium 3825U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-2467M versus 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3825U — a 19% clock advantage for the Core i5-2467M (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-2467M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium 3825U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2467M scores 1,410 against the Pentium 3825U's 1,396 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-2467M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2467M vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3825U.

Feature	Core i5-2467M	Pentium 3825U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+21%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.9 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)+50%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark	1,410+1%	1,396

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2467M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 3825U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-2467M	Pentium 3825U
Socket	BGA1023	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-2467M) / not specified (Pentium 3825U). The Core i5-2467M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Pentium 3825U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2467M rivals Core i5-2410M.