Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Core i5-2467M

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Core i5-2467M Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

2 / 2

1,425

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-2467M

2 / 4

1,410

0.0%

Celeron B820

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Core i5-2467M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Core i5-2467M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $136 MSRP, while Core i5-2467M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌423.5% higher power demand at 89W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2467M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-2467M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 89W, a 72W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Athlon 64 X2 5000+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 64 X2 5000+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,410 vs 1,425).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 X2 5000+ better than Core i5-2467M?

Yes. Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 X2 5000+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $136 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-2467M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Core i5-2467M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,425 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-2467M

The Core i5-2467M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,410 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-2467M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-2467M — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5000+. The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i5-2467M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ scores 1,425 against the Core i5-2467M's 1,410 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5000+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2467M.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5000+	Core i5-2467M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+13%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	90 nm	32 nm-64%
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,425+1%	1,410

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-2467M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ versus 1333 on the Core i5-2467M — the Core i5-2467M supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) vs 16 (Core i5-2467M) — the Core i5-2467M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i5-2467M).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5000+	Core i5-2467M
Socket	AM2	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) / true (Core i5-2467M). The Core i5-2467M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2467M rivals Core i5-2410M.