Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron N4000C

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron N4000C Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

2 / 2

1,425

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N4000C

2 / 2

1,430

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron N4000C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron N4000C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,425 vs 1,430).
❌Launch MSRP is still $136 MSRP, while Celeron N4000C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1383.3% higher power demand at 89W vs 6W.

Celeron N4000C

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 89W, a 83W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4000C better than Athlon 64 X2 5000+?

Yes. Celeron N4000C is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4000C is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4000C is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N4000C comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $136 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 X2 5000+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (10.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4000C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron N4000C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,425 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron N4000C

The Celeron N4000C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Celeron N4000C share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000C — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is built on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ scores 1,425 against the Celeron N4000C's 1,430 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron N4000C. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs 4 MB on the Celeron N4000C.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5000+	Celeron N4000C
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	90 nm	14 nm-84%
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	—
PassMark	1,425	1,430

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron N4000C uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.