
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron N4000C

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

Celeron N4000C
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is positioned at rank 988 and the Celeron N4000C is on rank 721, so the Celeron N4000C offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Performance Per Dollar Celeron N4000C
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ | Celeron N4000C |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ | Celeron N4000C |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Celeron N4000C

Athlon 64 X2 5000+
The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,425 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron N4000C
The Celeron N4000C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Celeron N4000C share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000C — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is built on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ scores 1,425 against the Celeron N4000C's 1,430 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron N4000C. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs 4 MB on the Celeron N4000C.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ | Celeron N4000C |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | — |
| Process | 90 nm | 14 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Windsor (2006−2007) | — |
| PassMark | 1,425 | 1,430 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron N4000C uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ | Celeron N4000C |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | FCBGA1090 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















