Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron N2805

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron N2805 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

2 / 2

1,425

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N2805

2 / 2

1,430

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron N2805 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron N2805: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,425 vs 1,430).
❌Launch MSRP is still $136 MSRP, while Celeron N2805 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2125% higher power demand at 89W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2805 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron N2805

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 4W instead of 89W, a 85W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Athlon 64 X2 5000+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2805 better than Athlon 64 X2 5000+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2805 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2805 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2805 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2805 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $136 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. Athlon 64 X2 5000+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (10.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2805 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron N2805 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,425 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron N2805

The Celeron N2805 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 1.46 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Celeron N2805 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ versus 1.46 GHz on the Celeron N2805 — a 56.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5000+. The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron N2805 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ scores 1,425 against the Celeron N2805's 1,430 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron N2805. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5000+	Celeron N2805
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+78%	1.46 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.46 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K (per core)
Process	90 nm	22 nm-76%
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,425	1,430

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron N2805 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ versus 1066 on the Celeron N2805 — the Celeron N2805 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) vs 1 (Celeron N2805). PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) vs 4 (Celeron N2805) — the Celeron N2805 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) and FCBGA1170 (Celeron N2805).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5000+	Celeron N2805
Socket	AM2	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	1066+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) / true (Celeron N2805). The Celeron N2805 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2805 rivals AMD E1-2100.