Core i5-2467M
VS
Pentium D 820

Core i5-2467M vs Pentium D 820

Intel

Core i5-2467M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium D 820

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2467M is positioned at rank 729 and the Pentium D 820 is on rank 1065, so the Core i5-2467M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2467M

#717
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1040%
#718
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1025%
#719
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
941%
#720
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
937%
#721
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
928%
#723
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
896%
#724
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
860%
#725
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
858%
#726
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
835%
#729
Core i5-2467M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#744
Pentium 6805
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium D 820

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
53194%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
50263%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
36495%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
10994%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
8709%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
7618%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
4363%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
4306%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3921%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3921%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3877%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3772%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3720%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3705%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3671%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
100%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
99%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
99%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
98%
#1069
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
96%
#1070
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
96%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
92%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
85%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
84%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
81%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
79%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
73%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
69%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
68%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
67%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
67%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-2467M (2011) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-2467MPentium D 820
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium D 820 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-2467MPentium D 820
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2467M and Pentium D 820

Intel

Core i5-2467M

The Core i5-2467M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,410 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Pentium D 820

The Pentium D 820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,412 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-2467M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium D 820's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-2467M versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium D 820 — a 19.6% clock advantage for the Pentium D 820 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-2467M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium D 820 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2467M scores 1,410 against the Pentium D 820's 1,412 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium D 820. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2467M vs 0 kB on the Pentium D 820.

FeatureCore i5-2467MPentium D 820
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz+22%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
32 nm-64%
90 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
1,410
1,412
Geekbench 6 Single
166
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2467M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium D 820 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i5-2467M versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium D 820 — the Core i5-2467M supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-2467M supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-2467M) vs 0 (Pentium D 820) — the Core i5-2467M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i5-2467M) and Intel 945,Intel 955 (Pentium D 820).

FeatureCore i5-2467MPentium D 820
Socket
BGA1023
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1333+66550%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
16
4 GB+26214300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i5-2467M) vs No (Pentium D 820). The Core i5-2467M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Pentium D 820 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2467M rivals Core i5-2410M.

FeatureCore i5-2467MPentium D 820
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
No