Core i5-2467M vs Pentium 2020M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-2467M vs Pentium 2020M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-2467M vs Pentium 2020M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-2467M

2011

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 17W instead of 512W, a 495W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,410 vs 1,412).

Pentium 2020M

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Core i5-2467M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2911.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 2020M better than Core i5-2467M?

Yes. Pentium 2020M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium 2020M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 2020M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 2020M is the better buy right now. Pentium 2020M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 2020M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-2467M vs Pentium 2020M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2467M

The Core i5-2467M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,410 points. Launch price was $250.

Pentium 2020M

The Pentium 2020M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,412 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-2467M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium 2020M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-2467M versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 2020M — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Pentium 2020M (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-2467M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium 2020M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2467M scores 1,410 against the Pentium 2020M's 1,412 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium 2020M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2467M vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 2020M.

Feature	Core i5-2467M	Pentium 2020M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+4%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.4 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)+50%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,410	1,412
Geekbench 6 Single	—	391
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	667

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2467M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 2020M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i5-2467M versus DDR3-1600 on the Pentium 2020M — the Pentium 2020M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium 2020M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i5-2467M) and HM70,HM75,HM76,HM77 (Pentium 2020M).

Feature	Core i5-2467M	Pentium 2020M
Socket	BGA1023	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-2467M) vs VT-x / EPT (Pentium 2020M). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2467M) and Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Pentium 2020M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium 2020M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-2467M rivals Core i5-2410M.

Feature	Core i5-2467M	Pentium 2020M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 3000	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x / EPT
Target Use	—	Budget