Core i5-2467M vs Xeon E3-1220L v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-2467M vs Xeon E3-1220L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-2467M vs Xeon E3-1220L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-2467M

2011

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Xeon E3-1220L v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Xeon E3-1220L v3

2013

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 16W instead of 17W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,407 vs 1,410).
❌Launch MSRP is still $193 MSRP, while Core i5-2467M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2467M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-2467M better than Xeon E3-1220L v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1220L v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-2467M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-2467M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2467M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-2467M is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1220L v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-2467M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1220L v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1220L v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-2467M vs Xeon E3-1220L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2467M

The Core i5-2467M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,410 points. Launch price was $250.

Xeon E3-1220L v3

The Xeon E3-1220L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,407 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-2467M and Xeon E3-1220L v3 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-2467M versus 1.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220L v3 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-2467M (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i5-2467M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2467M scores 1,410 against the Xeon E3-1220L v3's 1,407 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-2467M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2467M vs 4096 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1220L v3.

Feature	Core i5-2467M	Xeon E3-1220L v3
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+53%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+45%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4096 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,410	1,407

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2467M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1220L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i5-2467M versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E3-1220L v3 — the Xeon E3-1220L v3 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E3-1220L v3 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i5-2467M) and C222,C224,C226 (Xeon E3-1220L v3).

Feature	Core i5-2467M	Xeon E3-1220L v3
Socket	BGA1023	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-2467M) vs VT-P (Xeon E3-1220L v3). The Core i5-2467M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon E3-1220L v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2467M rivals Core i5-2410M.