Pentium 3825U vs Pentium E5300

Intel

Pentium 3825U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Pentium E5300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2008

Pentium 3825U vs Pentium E5300 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 3825U vs Pentium E5300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 3825U vs Pentium E5300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 3825U

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Pentium E5300

2008

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (1,395 vs 1,396).
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $62 MSRP, while Pentium 3825U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E5300 better than Pentium 3825U?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium E5300 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 3825U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 3825U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium E5300 is the better buy right now. Pentium E5300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $62 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium 3825U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium 3825U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium 3825U vs Pentium E5300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Pentium 3825U

The Pentium 3825U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,396 points. Launch price was $161.

Intel

Pentium E5300

The Pentium E5300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008βˆ’2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,395 points. Launch price was $64.

⚑

Processing Power

The Pentium 3825U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium E5300's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3825U versus 2.6 GHz on the Pentium E5300 β€” a 31.1% clock advantage for the Pentium E5300 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Pentium 3825U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium E5300 uses Wolfdale (2008βˆ’2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 3825U scores 1,396 against the Pentium E5300's 1,395 β€” a 0.1% lead for the Pentium 3825U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3825U vs 0 kB on the Pentium E5300.

FeaturePentium 3825UPentium E5300
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
2.6 GHz+37%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.6 GHz+37%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+12700%
2 MB (total)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Wolfdale (2008βˆ’2010)
PassMark
1,396
1,395
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 3825U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E5300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 3825UPentium E5300
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1