Pentium M 750
VS
Celeron 440

Pentium M 750 vs Celeron 440

Intel

Pentium M 750

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2005
VS
Intel

Celeron 440

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 750 is positioned at rank 131 and the Celeron 440 is on rank 1031, so the Pentium M 750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 750

#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
95%
#119
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
302%
#120
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
298%
#121
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
274%
#122
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
272%
#123
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
270%
#125
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
261%
#126
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
250%
#127
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
249%
#128
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
243%
#131
Pentium M 750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#137
N200
MSRP: $193|Avg: N/A
98%
#138
Core 2 Duo SP9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
97%
#140
Core 2 Duo P8700
MSRP: $241|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 440

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
38964%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
36818%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
26733%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8053%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6379%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5581%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3196%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3155%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2872%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2872%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2840%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2763%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2725%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2714%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2689%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
96%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
100%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
97%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
97%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
95%
#1036
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
95%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
95%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
95%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
95%
#1040
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
94%
#1041
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
94%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
93%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
91%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
91%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron 440 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium M 750 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium M 750Celeron 440
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe-L (2007−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium M 750Celeron 440
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 750 and Celeron 440

Intel

Pentium M 750

The Pentium M 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 440

The Celeron 440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $40.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 750 and Celeron 440 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Pentium M 750 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron 440 — a 7.3% clock advantage for the Celeron 440 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Pentium M 750 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron 440 uses Conroe-L (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 750 scores 485 against the Celeron 440's 472 — a 2.7% lead for the Pentium M 750. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium M 750Celeron 440
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz
2 GHz+8%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
2 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
90 nm
65 nm-28%
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
Conroe-L (2007−2008)
PassMark
485+3%
472
Geekbench 6 Single
244
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 750 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 440 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium M 750Celeron 440
Socket
PGA478
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium M 750) / No (Celeron 440). Primary use case: Celeron 440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 440 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeaturePentium M 750Celeron 440
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget