Pentium N3520
VS
Celeron G460

Pentium N3520 vs Celeron G460

Intel

Pentium N3520

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.42 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron G460

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium N3520 is positioned at rank 1046 and the Celeron G460 is on rank 586, so the Celeron G460 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N3520

#1034
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2565%
#1035
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2527%
#1036
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2320%
#1037
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2309%
#1038
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2288%
#1040
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2210%
#1041
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2119%
#1042
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2115%
#1043
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2059%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
99%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
97%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
97%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
96%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
95%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
94%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
94%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
93%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
93%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G460

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10072%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9517%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6910%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2082%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1649%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1442%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
826%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
815%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
742%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
742%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
734%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
714%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
704%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
701%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
695%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
99%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
98%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
100%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
100%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
99%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
99%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
98%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
97%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
97%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
97%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
96%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium N3520 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G460 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium N3520Celeron G460
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron G460 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($10 vs $10) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium N3520Celeron G460
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+0%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium N3520 and Celeron G460

Intel

Pentium N3520

The Pentium N3520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.17 GHz, with boost up to 2.42 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,144 points. Launch price was $161.

Intel

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

Processing Power

The Pentium N3520 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G460 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium N3520 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.42 GHz on the Pentium N3520 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 — a 29.4% clock advantage for the Pentium N3520 (base: 2.17 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Pentium N3520 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G460 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium N3520 scores 1,144 against the Celeron G460's 1,145 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G460. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Pentium N3520 vs 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460.

FeaturePentium N3520Celeron G460
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+300%
1 / 2
Boost Clock
2.42 GHz+34%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.17 GHz+21%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,144
1,145
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium N3520 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G460 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium N3520Celeron G460
Socket
FCBGA1170
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium N3520) / VT-x (Celeron G460). The Celeron G460 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium N3520 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.

FeaturePentium N3520Celeron G460
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium N3520 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron G460 debuted at $37. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Celeron G460 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium N3520 delivers 114.4 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G460 — making the Celeron G460 the 0.1% better value option.

FeaturePentium N3520Celeron G460
MSRP
$100
$37-63%
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$10
Performance per Dollar
114.4
114.5
Release Date
2013
2011