Pentium N3520
VS
Celeron G530

Pentium N3520 vs Celeron G530

Intel

Pentium N3520

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.42 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron G530

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium N3520 is positioned at rank 1046 and the Celeron G530 is on rank 635, so the Celeron G530 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N3520

#1034
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2565%
#1035
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2527%
#1036
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2320%
#1037
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2309%
#1038
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2288%
#1040
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2210%
#1041
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2119%
#1042
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2115%
#1043
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2059%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
99%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
97%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
97%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
96%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
95%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
94%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
94%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
93%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
93%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G530

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11406%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10777%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7825%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2357%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1867%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1634%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
936%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
923%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
841%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
841%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
831%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
809%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
798%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
794%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
787%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
100%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
100%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#640
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
99%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
99%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
99%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
98%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
98%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
98%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
97%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium N3520 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G530 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium N3520Celeron G530
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron G530 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($10 vs $10) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium N3520Celeron G530
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+0%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium N3520 and Celeron G530

Intel

Pentium N3520

The Pentium N3520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.17 GHz, with boost up to 2.42 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,144 points. Launch price was $161.

Intel

Celeron G530

The Celeron G530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Pentium N3520 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G530 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium N3520 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.42 GHz on the Pentium N3520 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G530 — a 0.8% clock advantage for the Pentium N3520 (base: 2.17 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Pentium N3520 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G530 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium N3520 scores 1,144 against the Celeron G530's 1,148 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G530. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Pentium N3520 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G530.

FeaturePentium N3520Celeron G530
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.42 GHz
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.17 GHz
2.4 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
2 MB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,144
1,148
Geekbench 6 Single
379
Geekbench 6 Multi
663
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium N3520 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G530 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium N3520Celeron G530
Socket
FCBGA1170
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium N3520) / VT-x (Celeron G530). The Celeron G530 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium N3520 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G530 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G530 rivals Pentium G630.

FeaturePentium N3520Celeron G530
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium N3520 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron G530 debuted at $42. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Celeron G530 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium N3520 delivers 114.4 pts/$ vs 114.8 pts/$ for the Celeron G530 — making the Celeron G530 the 0.3% better value option.

FeaturePentium N3520Celeron G530
MSRP
$100
$42-58%
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$10
Performance per Dollar
114.4
114.8
Release Date
2013
2011