Pentium N3540
VS
Celeron J3355

Pentium N3540 vs Celeron J3355

Intel

Pentium N3540

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron J3355

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium N3540 is positioned at rank 1149 and the Celeron J3355 is on rank 425, so the Celeron J3355 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N3540

#1137
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3912%
#1138
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3855%
#1139
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3539%
#1140
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3523%
#1141
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3490%
#1143
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3371%
#1144
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3232%
#1145
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3227%
#1146
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3140%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
99%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
98%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
96%
#1155
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
96%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
95%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
94%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
93%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3355

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6218%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5876%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4266%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1285%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1018%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
891%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
510%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
503%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
458%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
458%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
453%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
441%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
435%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
433%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
429%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
98%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
98%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
97%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
94%
#425
Celeron J3355
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
100%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
99%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
97%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
96%
#436
Ryzen 5 1500X
MSRP: $189|Avg: $67
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium N3540 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron J3355 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium N3540Celeron J3355
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium N3540Celeron J3355
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium N3540 and Celeron J3355

Intel

Pentium N3540

The Pentium N3540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,207 points. Launch price was $251.

Intel

Celeron J3355

The Celeron J3355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,203 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The Pentium N3540 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron J3355 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium N3540 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Pentium N3540 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J3355 — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Pentium N3540 (base: 2.16 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Pentium N3540 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron J3355 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium N3540 scores 1,207 against the Celeron J3355's 1,203 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium N3540. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium N3540 vs 0 kB on the Celeron J3355.

FeaturePentium N3540Celeron J3355
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.66 GHz+6%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.16 GHz+8%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark
1,207
1,203
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
850
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium N3540 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron J3355 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium N3540Celeron J3355
Socket
FCBGA1170
FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium N3540) / VT-x (Celeron J3355). The Celeron J3355 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Pentium N3540 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3355 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3355 rivals Pentium J4205.

FeaturePentium N3540Celeron J3355
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power