Pentium N3540
VS
Celeron M U3400

Pentium N3540 vs Celeron M U3400

Intel

Pentium N3540

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron M U3400

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.06 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium N3540 is positioned at rank 1149 and the Celeron M U3400 is on rank 998, so the Celeron M U3400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N3540

#1137
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3912%
#1138
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3855%
#1139
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3539%
#1140
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3523%
#1141
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3490%
#1143
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3371%
#1144
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3232%
#1145
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3227%
#1146
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3140%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
99%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
98%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
96%
#1155
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
96%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
95%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
94%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
93%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M U3400

#986
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2094%
#987
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2064%
#988
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1894%
#989
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1886%
#990
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1869%
#992
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1804%
#993
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1730%
#994
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1727%
#995
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1681%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
100%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
100%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
98%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
97%
#1010
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
97%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
97%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
96%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium N3540 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron M U3400 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium N3540Celeron M U3400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron M U3400 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $5 (vs $161), it costs 97% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 3115% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Pentium N3540.
InsightPentium N3540Celeron M U3400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+3115%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium N3540 and Celeron M U3400

Intel

Pentium N3540

The Pentium N3540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,207 points. Launch price was $251.

Intel

Celeron M U3400

The Celeron M U3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.06 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,205 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Pentium N3540 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M U3400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium N3540 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Pentium N3540 versus 1.06 GHz on the Celeron M U3400 — a 86% clock advantage for the Pentium N3540. The Pentium N3540 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron M U3400 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium N3540 scores 1,207 against the Celeron M U3400's 1,205 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium N3540. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium N3540 vs 2 MB on the Celeron M U3400.

FeaturePentium N3540Celeron M U3400
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.66 GHz+151%
1.06 GHz
Base Clock
2.16 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,207
1,205
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium N3540 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M U3400 uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium N3540Celeron M U3400
Socket
FCBGA1170
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium N3540 launched at $161 MSRP, while the Celeron M U3400 debuted at $86. At current prices ($161 vs $5), the Celeron M U3400 is $156 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium N3540 delivers 7.5 pts/$ vs 241.0 pts/$ for the Celeron M U3400 — making the Celeron M U3400 the 187.9% better value option.

FeaturePentium N3540Celeron M U3400
MSRP
$161
$86-47%
Avg Price (30d)
$161
$5-97%
Performance per Dollar
7.5
241.0+3113%
Release Date
2014
2010