Pentium N4200
VS
Celeron G3900

Pentium N4200 vs Celeron G3900

Intel

Pentium N4200

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Celeron G3900

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium N4200 is positioned at rank 1012 and the Celeron G3900 is on rank 419, so the Celeron G3900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N4200

#1000
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2190%
#1001
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2157%
#1002
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1981%
#1003
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1972%
#1004
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1954%
#1006
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1887%
#1007
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1809%
#1008
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1806%
#1009
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1757%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
100%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
100%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
99%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
98%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
98%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
97%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
97%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
96%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
95%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
95%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
94%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
93%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6075%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5740%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4168%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1256%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
995%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
870%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
498%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
492%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
448%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
448%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
443%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
431%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
425%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
423%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
419%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
99%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
96%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
96%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
95%
#419
Celeron G3900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
100%
#420
Celeron G1840
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
99%
#421
Core i5-8400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $95
99%
#423
Phenom II X3 705e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $69
99%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
97%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
97%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G3900 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium N4200 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium N4200Celeron G3900
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($30.89)
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium N4200 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 21% cheaper ($30.89 vs $39) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium N4200Celeron G3900
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+26%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30.89)
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium N4200 and Celeron G3900

Intel

Pentium N4200

The Pentium N4200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,158 points. Launch price was $161.

Intel

Celeron G3900

The Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,155 points. Launch price was $42.

Processing Power

The Pentium N4200 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3900 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium N4200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Pentium N4200 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G3900 — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Pentium N4200 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G3900 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium N4200 scores 2,158 against the Celeron G3900's 2,155 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium N4200. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium N4200 vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G3900.

FeaturePentium N4200Celeron G3900
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
2.8 GHz+155%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,158
2,155
Geekbench 6 Single
680
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium N4200 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3900 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium N4200Celeron G3900
Socket
FCBGA1296
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium N4200) / VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3900). The Celeron G3900 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 510), while the Pentium N4200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900 rivals Pentium G4400.

FeaturePentium N4200Celeron G3900
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium N4200 launched at $161 MSRP, while the Celeron G3900 debuted at $42. At current prices ($30.89 vs $39), the Pentium N4200 is $8 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium N4200 delivers 69.9 pts/$ vs 55.3 pts/$ for the Celeron G3900 — making the Pentium N4200 the 23.3% better value option.

FeaturePentium N4200Celeron G3900
MSRP
$161
$42-74%
Avg Price (30d)
$30.89-21%
$39
Performance per Dollar
69.9+26%
55.3
Release Date
2016
2015