Pentium N4200 vs Phenom II X4 910e

Intel

Pentium N4200

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 910e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Pentium N4200 vs Phenom II X4 910e Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium N4200 vs Phenom II X4 910e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium N4200 vs Phenom II X4 910e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium N4200

2016

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 2.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $161 MSRPvs$157 MSRP

Phenom II X4 910e

2010

Why buy it

  • +200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
  • Costs $4 less on MSRP ($157 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,148 vs 2,158).
  • 3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N4200 better than Phenom II X4 910e?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom II X4 910e is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 25 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N4200 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Phenom II X4 910e also has the bigger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N4200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium N4200 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium N4200 comes in 2.5% more expensive on MSRP at $161 MSRP versus $157 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Phenom II X4 910e only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 2.1% better value on paper (13.7 vs 13.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium N4200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium N4200 vs Phenom II X4 910e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Pentium N4200

The Pentium N4200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,158 points. Launch price was $161.

AMD

Phenom II X4 910e

The Phenom II X4 910e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,148 points. Launch price was $157.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium N4200 and Phenom II X4 910e share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Pentium N4200 versus 2.6 GHz on the Phenom II X4 910e — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 910e (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Pentium N4200 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X4 910e uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium N4200 scores 2,158 against the Phenom II X4 910e's 2,148 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium N4200. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium N4200 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 910e.

FeaturePentium N4200Phenom II X4 910e
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz+4%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
2.6 GHz+136%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,158
2,148
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium N4200 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 910e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium N4200Phenom II X4 910e
Socket
FCBGA1296
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium N4200) / AMD-V (Phenom II X4 910e). Primary use case: Phenom II X4 910e targets Desktop.

FeaturePentium N4200Phenom II X4 910e
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium N4200 was priced at $161, while the Phenom II X4 910e came in at $157. On launch pricing ($161 vs $157), Phenom II X4 910e was $4 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium N4200 delivers 13.4 pts/$ vs 13.7 pts/$ for the Phenom II X4 910e — making the Phenom II X4 910e the 2.1% better value option.

FeaturePentium N4200Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP
$161
$157-2%
Performance per Dollar
13.4
13.7+2%
Release Date
2016
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.